The Carreira da India Lives On:Houthi Red Sea Attacks Prompt Shipping Rethink

There is an apocryphal tale of how the Portuguese captain Vasco da Gama subdued a potential mutiny amongst his crew. Having rounded the Cape of Good Hope at the tip of southern Africa in 1497, the realisation of reaching India from Europe via a sea route was close. Yet, assailed by Muslim traders and buffeted by fierce weather, da Gama’s men wished to turn for home. In an act of righteous grandeur, the captain dispensed with the ship’s instruments and navigational maps overboard, imploring his men to trust in God, whose helmsman he claimed to be. A few months later they made landfall in Calicut and the history of the world changed.

Vasco da Gama arrives at Calicut, India in 1498. World History Encyclopaedia

The Portuguese sea route to India (the Carreira da India) would usher in an era of European colonialism in the east. Trade with sultans and emirs would mature into military conquest and subordination, the colossal voyages (giant ships travelling six months each way) awaited with eager anticipation by the rulers in Lisbon and continental merchants. Having seen Christopher Columbus claim the New World for Spain in his attempts to find a sea route to the ‘Indies’, da Gama had charted a course for the smaller Iberian power to create the first global empire.

Da Gama’s voyage was the culmination of over a century of progressive exploration and technological improvement. After Gil Eannes rounded the infamously treacherous Cape Bojador on the West Saharan coast in 1434 (Parry, p.146), subsequent Portuguese navigators charted increasingly southerly courses towards the base of the African continent, a region still shrouded in mystery. In early 1488, Bartolomeu Dias rounded the Cape of Good Hope and Cape Agulhas (the Cape of the Needles), breaching the Atlantic-Indian Ocean divide. He initially named Africa’s southern promontory the Stormy Cape, only for Portuguese King Joao II to rename it the Cape of Good Hope, ‘because it promised the discovery of India, so long desired and sought for over so many years’ (Crowley pp. 31-33).

The Carreira da India. Source: Wikimedia Commons

Until the construction of the Suez Canal in the 1860s – connecting the Mediterranean with the Red Sea – maritime traffic between Europe and the East passed around the Cape of Good Hope. Fortunes soared and foundered on the treacherous passage. And yet despite Suez and the rise in long-distance air and rail freight, this lengthy southern route is still plied. Indeed, it is increasingly so due to the political instability of the Middle East.

Houthi rebels continue to attack commercial shipping in the Red Sea with a combination of missiles and drones. Despite retaliatory strikes by American and British forces, the Yemeni group appears undeterred and their Iranian patrons either unwilling or unable to rein them in. Consequently, commercial shipping lines are taking the almost unthinkable move of rolling back the clock a century-and-a-half and committing more cargo to the journey around the Cape of Good Hope.

Backed by Iran, the Houthis are causing chaos in the Red Sea. Source: Politico

Danish shipping giant Maersk has ruled out using the Red Sea route for the remainder of 2024. It is sending more ships southwards at great cost, with a 40% fuel increase required both due to the greater distance and speeds needed to get cargo to and from eastern ports in a commercially viable timeframe. The economic costs get passed on to consumers, whilst the environmental costs from increased fuel consumption are at this stage incalculable.

It is a reminder that our reliance on maritime trade networks is still very much comparable to bygone eras. Crucial chokepoints in shipping routes are blatantly evident, as demonstrated by the chaos caused when the Ever Given ran aground in the Suez Canal in 2021 and closed the waterway for 6 days. The Strait of Malacca, meanwhile, is the most critical shipping route between the Indian and Pacific Oceans and yet is only 40 miles wide at its narrowest point. Concerns regarding China’s intentions in the South China Sea give cause to fear a potential closure of this waterway, with alternative routes few and far between.

The pioneers of the 15th and 16th century made international trade possible. And yet despite substantial technological advancement, our desire for global goods remains undimmed and our reliance on historic transport routes amazingly high. The opportunity such a reliance gives nefarious state actors, rebels and terrorist groups is clear to see. Without a concerted transnational effort, the Carreira da India will live on beyond the 21st century.

An Indiaman in a North-Wester off the Cape of Good Hope by William Daniell. Source: Royal Academy of Arts

Additional reading

Crowley, R. Conquerors: How Portugal Seized the Indian Ocean and Forged the First Global Empire (2015)

Parry, J. H. The Age of Reconnaissance (1963)

On the Cusp of a Third Intifada: Israeli-Palestinian Conflict in Brutal Reignition

Israeli airstrikes on Gaza are ‘just the beginning’ according to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The reprisals follow the surprise attack launched by Hamas militants from Gaza on Saturday, with upwards of 900 people killed in Israel and nearly 700 in Palestine. The prospects of a Third Intifada are remarkably high, following years of growing tensions in the Holy Land during which the Israeli government has become increasingly nationalistic in outlook and the Palestinians increasingly divided among themselves.

Palestinians celebrate the destruction of an Israeli tank near the Gaza Strip fence. Source: The Guardian

The First Intifada, ‘shaking off’ in Arabic, took place between 1987 and 1993. What began as a spontaneous Palestinian revolt on the 20th anniversary of Israel’s occupation in Gaza and the West Bank, was spurred on by the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO). Tactics included strikes, boycotts and confrontations with Israeli troops. Some 2,000 Palestinians died and up to 200 Israelis. The sporadic bloodshed forced a political awakening from both sides, with PLO recognition of Israel and the Israeli acceptance of Palestinian self-rule through the creation of the Palestinian Authority (PA). These advances were solidified by the Oslo Accords. (Britannica Concise Encyclopaedia, p. 932).

The promise of the Oslo Accords faded as quickly as it materialised. By the end of the 20th century, neither the Israelis nor the Palestinians could agree on a peaceful, long-term solution to their territorial dispute. When Ariel Sharon visited al-Haram-al-Sharif (Temple Mount) in East Jerusalem in a display of Jewish intransigence, Palestinians engaged in stone-throwing at the police force guarding him. When the police responded by gunning down 18 Palestinian protestors, a Second Intifada erupted:

Then the leader of the opposition Likud Party, Ariel Sharon’s visit to Temple Mount infuriated the Palestinians. He was elected Israeli Prime Minister the following year. Source: New York Post

Its outbreak resulted from the widespread disillusionment of Palestinians, especially the younger generation, both with the failure of the Oslo peace process to end the daily humiliations of an occupation that had gone on for over thirty years and with the inept and authoritarian rule of [Yaser] Arafat’s Palestinian Authority. (Bunton, p. 98)

By summer 2003, 2,400 Palestinians and 800 Israelis had died amidst ongoing violence. The Intifada eventually petered out in early 2005, with the Israeli disengagement from the Gaza Strip – which saw the dismantling and evacuation of 21 Israeli settlements – and the construction of the West Bank Barrier.

Part of the West Bank Barrier. Source: ITV News

There has been little respite since the conclusion of the Second Intifada. The corruption and incompetence of the PA has alienated ever more Palestinians. In 2006 the PA ruptured, when Hamas broke from its uneasy unity with Fatah, seizing control of the Gaza Strip in 2007. The PA maintains nominal control in the West Bank, but only through effective Israeli overlordship. It has little, if any, credibility left. Hamas, meanwhile, has retained its militant core, allying with other violent regional groups such as Hezbollah in Lebanon, whilst winning support from ordinary Palestinians through its service provision in Gaza. On the other side, Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank has proliferated, whilst an increasingly right-wing government has fought to undermine the Palestinians at every step.  

Given the deteriorating relations between the opposing sides in recent months, it is unfathomable that the Israelis were so surprised by Saturday’s attacks. Even with a heavily funded, well-equipped and capable military, the intelligence services were seemingly blindsided. Not only have many Israelis been killed, but possibly dozens more have been taken hostage by Hamas. This makes any military intervention in Gaza particularly risky, with a high chance of accidentally killing Israeli nationals. Several foreign nationals have already died in the attacks and the potential to embroil outside powers means that a Third Intifada may be the deadliest yet. Indeed, the casualty numbers are already startlingly high.

The PA has increasingly worked with the Israeli government to undermine resistance. Source: The New Arab

History has a nasty tendency of repeating itself in the Israel-Palestinian conflict. Without both sides’ political leaders exercising restraint, and a major international mediation effort, this period could leave a particularly dark mark on already irredeemably stained relationship.

Other sources

Britannica Concise Encyclopaedia (2002)

Bunton, M. (2013), The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict: A Very Short Introduction