Unreasonable Miners Show Zuma Weakness with Proposed Strike Action

South African gold miners will begin a mass strike on Tuesday after rejecting government offers of a 6% wage increase. Demanding an extortionate 60% pay rise, members of the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM) are set to cause huge disruption to one of South Africa’s most important industries.

Fears are already being raised that any attempts to coerce the miners back to work will result in a massacre similar to the one that occurred at the Marikana platinum mine last year, when 34 workers were shot dead by police.

The Marikana massacre starkly highlighted Zuma's mismanagement of the mining industry
The Marikana massacre starkly highlighted Zuma’s mismanagement of the mining industry

Wages for miners are low in South Africa, that is indisputable. A 6% wage increase would only be commensurate with current inflation rates, yet to demand 60% is madness. The living conditions of the miners compared to some of their fellow countrymen is surprisingly salubrious, removed as they are from the lowest levels of poverty by a regular wage and arranged living.

Furthermore, their work conditions are incomparable to those of their predecessors, who worked South Africa’s first massive gold mines from the end of the 19th century.

One of the first large miners’ strikes in South African history occurred in 1913, when white English-born miners were faced down by 70,000 Afrikaner troops sent by Jan Smuts. The Riotous Assemblies Act that passed following the strike was later used to severe affect against black protesters and strikers.

Clashes during the 1913 miners' strike
Clashes during the 1913 miners’ strike

For white miners in early 20th century South Africa, conditions were appalling. Working hours were inordinately long, hygiene at work hostels was abominable and wages were kept lower than the price of inflation.

Black workers, on the other hand, were subjected to virtual slavery. Forced to migrate to the big mining compounds from their homelands, they were kept segregated from society whilst barely being paid. By the time they returned to their ancestral farmsteads they would have spent what little wages they had earned, forcing them to return to the mines.

During the Second World War, when demand for minerals and energy resources grew, labour unions began to emerge amongst the black workforce. The Council of Non-European Trade Unions (CNETU) formed without government recognition, gaining 119 affiliated organisations and 150,000 members. Between 1940 and 1945, the number of hours lost in strikes increased from 6,000 to 90,000 annually.

Despite the government being forced to relax its restrictions on African workers set under the ‘separate development’ policy – due to their importance to the war effort – wages were deliberately stagnated against rising living costs. Rather than reason, Smuts again sent in the troops on any occasion when the strikes became too effective.

It is impossible to put a figure on the number of striking miners killed by the security forces in either the pre-WWII or Apartheid era South Africa, during which black miners were forcibly coerced into cramped work camps for little pay. Needless to say, the numbers far exceed those killed in incidents today. Additionally, the living conditions for the South African miners of the past were far worse than for those today.

Black mining compound at Kimberley
Black mining compound at Kimberley

Jacob Zuma has a lot to answer for. As head of the African National Congress (ANC), the supposed champions of the impoverished, he should have empathy for dissatisfied workers and have avoided a deterioration in relations with an important workforce which has led to such unreasonable demands.

However, he is too concerned with lining his own pockets through a convenient relationship with big business, including the powers-that-be in the mining industry. He wants to appease them by keeping worker wages low, at the same time hoping to encourage foreign investment.

But who is going to invest in an industry corruptly and unfairly managed, breeding a volatile and deluded workforce? Maybe Mr Zuma can answer that one.


Mining and Legacy at the Heart of ANC Contest

Kgalema Motlanthe has formally announced that he is running to unseat South African President Jacob Zuma in an African National Congress (ANC) leadership vote next week. Motlanthe, the current Vice-President and former interim president, has ignored claims from ANC politicians that his challenge to Zuma is a threat to the stability of the party. Since firebrand ANC Youth League leader Julius Malema was expelled from the party earlier this year, alternatives to Zuma, unpopular amongst South Africa’s younger generation, have been sought.

Partners become challengers as Motlanthe (R) takes on Zuma
Partners become challengers as Motlanthe (R) takes on Zuma

The choice of Motlanthe, a former Secretary General of the National Union of Mineworkers (NUM), as the Youth League’s preferred candidate is unsurprising. Mining has dominated South African politics and society for the past few months with widespread pay strikes and violent government crackdowns making the front-pages at home and abroad, culminating in the extensive coverage of the Marikana massacre in August. Zuma is widely seen as a stooge of the mine owners and the nomination of a former trade union leader like Motlanthe as a challenger for the ANC leadership is a clear statement of want from the Youth League.

The other prominent figure currently causing waves in South African politics is Cyril Ramaphosa. A supporter of Zuma, Ramaphosa will be offered the Vice-Presidentship if Zuma defeats Motlanthe in the leadership contest. Interestingly, Ramphosa is a man, like Motlanthe, inextricably linked to the trade union movement in South Africa. Indeed, he was key in developing the NUM during the 1980s and was an important spokesman for black workers’ rights during the Apartheid era.

Such a history should make Ramaphosa the ideal candidate of the ANC Youth League. However, times have changed. Ramaphosa now represents big business and vested interests perhaps more than any other man in South Africa. Possessing a stake in Lonmin, the supposedly repressive and unfair owners of the Marikana mine, Ramaphosa called for strikers at the mine to be punished for their “criminal” behaviour just a day before the shooting started. For a former bastion of workers’ rights to take such a stance was deeply shocking and, for many, a sign of the decaying morality in South Africa under the corrupt Zuma leadership.

Ramaphosa is an increasingly ambiguous figure in South Africa
Ramaphosa is an increasingly ambiguous figure in South Africa

It is unfortunate that the ANC has no significant political challenger in South Africa. Complacency abounds in a government unconcerned by the corrupt practices that surround it, safe in the knowledge that re-election is a mere formality. Strikes at mines persist and are mirrored at public utilities companies and other industrial works nationwide. Motlanthe may not be the radical change the ANC Youth League desires but he has links to both the Apartheid struggle (he was imprisoned on Robben Island) and the trade union movement, neither of which he has yet severed. For that reason alone he is a worthy challenger to Zuma. What will happen if, as is expected, he loses, and what repercussions that will have for the unity of the ANC and South Africa in general, we shall soon discover.